A History of the Valley of Virginia by Samuel Kercheval (1833; 3rd ed. 1902)

193

WAR OF 1763.


CHAPTER II.

WAR OF 1763.


The treaty of peace between his British Majesty and the kings of France, Spain and Portugal, concluded at Paris on the 10th of February, 1763, did not put an end to the Indian war against the frontier parts and back settlements of the colonies of Great Britain.

The spring and summer of 1763, as well as those of 1764, deserve to be memorable in history, for the great extent and destructive results of a war of extermination, carried on by the united forces of all the Indians nations of the western country, along the shores of the northern lakes, and throughout the whole extent of the frontier settlements of Pennsylvania, Virginia and North Carolina.

The events of this war, as it relates to the frontier of Pennsylvania and the shores of the lakes, are matters of history already, and therefore shall be no further related here than is necessary to give a connected view of the military events of those disastrous seasons. The massacres by the Indians in the southwestern part of Virginia, so far as they have come to the knowledge of the author shall be related more in detail.

The English historian (Hist. of England, vol. 10, p. 399), attribute this terrible war to the influence of the French Jesuits over the Indians; but whether with much truth and candor, is, to say the least of it, extremely doubtful.

The peace of 1763, by which the provinces of Canada were ceded to Britain, was offensive to the Indians, especially as they very well knew that the English government, on the grounds of this treaty, claimed the jurisdiction of the western country generally; and as an Indian sees no difference between the right of jurisdiction and that of possession, they consider themselves as about to be dispossessed of the whole of their country, as rapidly as the English might find it convenient to take possession of it. In this opinion they were confirmed by the building of Forts on the Susquehanna, on lands to which the Indians laid claim. The forts and posts of Pittsburg, Bedford, Ligonier, Niagara, Detroit {typo corrected}, Presque Isle, St. Joseph and Michilimackinac, were either built, or improved and strengthened, with additions to their garrisons. Thus the Indians saw themselves surrounded on the north and east by a strong line of

25 Printer's mark




Notes Added for this Online Edition:


Note 1: Peace of Paris, 1763.


Quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1763)


Treaty of Paris (1763): The Treaty of Paris, often called the Peace of Paris, or the Treaty of 1763, was signed on February 10,1763, by the kingdoms of Great Britain, France and Spain, with Portugal in agreement. Together with the Treaty of Hubertusburg, it ended the French and Indian War/Seven Years' War.
[1] The treaties marked the beginning of an extensive period of British dominance outside of Europe.
[2] While the bulk of conquered territories were restored to their pre-war owners, the British made some substantial overseas gains at the expense of France and, to a lesser extent, Spain.
[3] Preferring to keep Guadeloupe, France gave up Canada and all of its claims to the territory east of the Mississippi River to Britain.
[4] Spain ceded Florida to the British, but later received New Orleans and French Louisiana from France; Manila and Cuba were restored to Spain. France retained Saint Pierre and Miquelon and recovered Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Saint Lucia in exchange for Dominica, Grenada, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Tobago going to the British.
In India, the French lost out to the British, receiving back its "factories" (trading posts), but agreeing to support the British client governments, as well as returning Sumatra and agreeing not to base troops in Bengal.
The British garrison on the Mediterranean island of Minorca was returned to her control, having been captured by the French at the outbreak of hostilities in Europe.
Britain returned the slave station on the isle of Gorée to the French, but gained the Senegal River and its settlements.
Britain agreed to demolish its fortifications in Honduras, but received permission from Spain to keep a logwood-cutting colony there.
Britain confirmed in the treaty the rights of its new subjects to practice the Roman Catholic religion[5] and received confirmation of the continuation of the British king's Hanoverian right as a Prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire.
It is sometimes claimed that the British King George III renounced his claim to be King of France by the treaty. However, this is a historical myth, and it is also falsely attributed to some of the treaties of the French Revolutionary Wars. Such a renunciation is nowhere in the text of the treaty, and, in fact, George III continued to be styled "King of France" and used the fleurs-de-lis as part of his arms until 1801, when Britain and Ireland united. It was dropped then because the claim was regarded as anachronistic:


[Kercheval's A History of the Valley of Virginia Home]
[Table of Contents] [Prev. Page] - - - - [Next Page]
[Go to Page# (i-iv, vi-xxx, 31-185, 188-308, 311-400, or 402-403):]
[ ]
[Advanced search]

Original programs & design copyright © EagleRidge Tech., Inc. 2005-2010. | Contact Us
Original material in this Online Edition of Kercheval's A History of the Valley of Virginia copyright © 2008-2010 by EagleRidge Technologies, Inc.

Original scans & commentaries copyright © RoaneTNHistory.org 2005-2010, except as noted. | webmaster @AT@ RoaneTNHistory.org | Privacy